
A reader sent this wonderful response to our Tuesday Truancy story. This may or may not be a feasible answer - that's not really my place to say. It is, however, the type of discourse that yields positive results, especially in a judicial election year.
The reader wrote the following.
"Here's an approach we may can take:
As I'm sure you're aware, automobile insurance companies offer a discount rate for families that have their children insured with them if they make good grades in school. Why can't we do the same for our schools? If a student remains in school, offer the parents a state income tax break. Parents will soon realize that it's much more of a financially sound incentive to push their children to remain in school. If the children are truant for more than three days or drop out of school then the tax break would be negated. I think that if parents took hits in their pocketbooks they would be more responsible for their children's actions."
I invite anyone to respond to this idea.













